(preamble: ok, so one of the major thorns in my side is the whole evolution/(un)intelligent design fiasco.)
anyway, i was surfing ebay looking for a neat little boxed set on evolution that i've been wanting for a while and i stumbled across this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/THE-SCIENCE-OF-EVOLUTION-DVD-Christian-Ray-Comfort_W0QQitemZ6467600770QQcategoryZ617QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
here's (one of)my major point of irritation:
it's called 'the science of evolution'
and THIS is part of its description
This DVD is unique in that it doesn't follow the usual format of Christian experts exposing the theory. Instead, it lets evolutionary believers put their own foot in their own mouth simply by asking them probing questions. Join Kirk and Ray as they take an orangutan to lunch, and call major airlines and ask if a "relative" can join them on a plane. The graphics on this DVD have been designed so that there is no indication that it is Christian or anti-evolution.
this asshole specifically attempts to hide all association with the fact that this is a wholly christian endeavor. (isn't lying one of your fucking mortal sins? you fucking bastard).
now if you set out to disprove evolution, fine, disprove it.
I dare you to.
but to specifically set out to hide who you are & discredit a valid scientific theory through contrived interviews?
Ray Comfort is the lying sack of shit behind this disgusting bit of propaganda.
and he is now added, by name, to the ever-growing list of fuckheads that i hate.
when the universe decides to wipe this asshole out i shall rejoice.
hell, i think a bunch of evolutionists (i.e. fairly rational human beings) should make a presence at his funeral. (much like several asshole 'christians' do when high profile gay folk die) with big signs say loud & clear 'thank mighty fuck you're gone'
so i reiterate....I HATE people.
-De
December 27, 2005
December 21, 2005
I Want to Thank God...
that god can't be taught in school... well in PA anyway.i love what the judge(jones) had to say (a republican christian no less)
Jones decried the “breathtaking inanity”
&
"(intelligent design)presents students with a religious alternative masquerading as a scientific theory, directs them to consult a creationist text as though it were a science resource and instructs students to forgo scientific inquiry in the public school classroom and instead to seek out religious instruction elsewhere."
&
In his ruling, Jones said that while intelligent design, or ID, arguments “may be true, a proposition on which the court takes no position, ID is not science.” Among other things, he said intelligent design “violates the centuries-old ground rules of science by invoking and permitting supernatural causation”; it relies on “flawed and illogical” arguments.
and did the proponents of (un)intelligent design take it well, no the main party (dover) had this to say:
“I’m still waiting for a judge or anyone to show me anywhere in the Constitution where there’s a separation of church and state,” he said. “We didn’t lose; we were robbed.”
well sir though technically right, the constitution also doesn't say 'right to a fair trial' so you can blame it on that....
Jones decried the “breathtaking inanity”
&
"(intelligent design)presents students with a religious alternative masquerading as a scientific theory, directs them to consult a creationist text as though it were a science resource and instructs students to forgo scientific inquiry in the public school classroom and instead to seek out religious instruction elsewhere."
&
In his ruling, Jones said that while intelligent design, or ID, arguments “may be true, a proposition on which the court takes no position, ID is not science.” Among other things, he said intelligent design “violates the centuries-old ground rules of science by invoking and permitting supernatural causation”; it relies on “flawed and illogical” arguments.
and did the proponents of (un)intelligent design take it well, no the main party (dover) had this to say:
“I’m still waiting for a judge or anyone to show me anywhere in the Constitution where there’s a separation of church and state,” he said. “We didn’t lose; we were robbed.”
well sir though technically right, the constitution also doesn't say 'right to a fair trial' so you can blame it on that....
December 01, 2005
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)